You were extremely harsh on India.
You said it's a country named after a river (the Indus) that it doesn't even own, and that it's essentially a 'franchise operation' left over from the East India Company.
You argued that because they never had a 'Land Revolution' (shuffling the Mahjong deck), they are stuck in a deadlock of caste and inefficiency.
But look at all the Indian CEOs running Silicon Valley today.
Doesn't that prove the 'software' of the people is fine, and you're underestimating their potential to fix the 'hardware'?